Here are proven methods to aid in the most efficient development time and to ensure an effective quality product.
In addition to the content you believe you want to transfer, it is important to consider who will receive the training. A course for an experienced or expert scientist is different from a course for a novice or newly hired assistant. Both audiences might be accommodated, but their needs should be accommodated through the course design or through a series of courses.
Your instructional designer (experienced course developer) will ask you questions such as:
It takes time, but saves time if your unit has already discussed the observable change they expect to see after training. What are the learning objectives -- the very specific behaviors that your learners will be able to demonstrate by the end of the training.
It helps to ask,What areproblems that we hope training will solve? What results do we want to change? What will the training specifically be doing to change behavior?
Learning objectives can cover skills (technical or psychosocial), knowledge, and attitudes. Seek to make them actionable and observable. It can help to structure each objective as What the learner will be able to DO, to What LEVEL of expertise, and under What CONDITIONS. Putting definition and boundaries for realistic expectations on a single course is often the most challenging part of the development process. However, the effort put in at the beginning will save re-work time and produce a more effective course that integrates with other training over time.
Examples:
Let this tool ask you questions to guide you through creating your objectives -https://teachonline.asu.edu/objectives-builder/
Your audience and your learning objectives will drive the selection of most elements of your training. See details in other tabs.
In general, a course includes:
Online On-Demand courses benefit from using research on effective online communication and learning processes.
Use images for good. Images can be a powerful and efficient way to build understanding but can also distract, detract, confuse the learner. Check with your instructional designer and artist.
Plan Graphics that:
Refer to the research on how to effectvely place content on the page and how to design "graphics for learning" particularly eLearning projects. Refer to basic art principles such as balance, flow, and light.
Ownership or permissions must be established and documented. We recommend any Google search for images is done by selecting the "Tools" option and then the "Usage Rights," and only going for Creative Commons options. These images are free to use and you don't have to worry about potentially infringing any copyright laws or asking for permissions. Images from .gov and .edu are typically in the public domain.
Collect and share communication resources with other ORRS developers. Ask for access to the ORRS network drive Communications Resources, typically labeled V: drive) which includes permissioned images. This is where your course developer stores purchased image and audio files collected from iStockphoto, DepositPhoto and other sides.
The goals of the training entirely drive the style, sequencing, and navigation oftext content. Instructional content does not follow the traditional structure of expository writing, research publications, government regulations, rules, standard operating procedures,technical journals, equipment or assembly instructions. The writing style also differs from websites and most newsletters.
Organize the content into digestible chunks that naturally flow (e.g. the order in which a worker does a task or from big picture to details). Try to sequence content to provide quick understanding of where the information sits in the learner's mental model of the course and the subject. Sometimes giving the overview prior to specific details is better than waiting to explain how how information or processes are inter-related.
Use plenty of meaningful headings and sub-headings to get across key messages. Adult learners are busy and have learned habits of skimming content. Adult learners are busy and have learned habits of skimming content. Your instructional designer and novice reviewers can provide feedback to improve organization of subjects or to add transitions that make sense to more learners.
Second person active voice (Do this thing in this way) can be more concise and clear. Research shows that even highly educated people benefit fromshort words and simple sentence structurewhen learning new information. Audio narration can be more friendly and wordy than on-screen text as long as the same information is provided. Scripts for instructor-led lesson plans are typically brief and allow the instructor to ad lib encouragements and anectdotes as time allows. Your instructional designer can work with you to convert regulatory, academic research, or legal text into practical, easily-digested instructions for the target audience that still brings your audience along to the final technical understanding they need. They can use on-screen mouse-over definitions and pronounciations or images.
Text planning considers coordination withother instructional elements like graphics, animations, and auditory support. Choose terminology that is more universal to different learners' background/s. Even very educated learners benefit from simple words and consistent terminology during adoptionof new concepts. Offer easy-access definitions if any of your audience will need reminders of technical words to keep learning even more information from the course.
There is also some research that indicates it is easier for many people to absorb text on a narrow column over a wide-space.
Instructional designers and other communication experts have experience in copy-editing,line editing, and proof-reading. However, all publications should be proof-read by multiple reviewers.
See alsohttps://www.plainlanguage.gov andhttps://knightcenter.jrn.msu.edu/lessons/write-stuff/passive-voice-squash-it/
All formal training includes verification that it is having the desired impact on the learner's behavior or attitude and/or desired positive outcomes for the organization. If it is not worth verifying the training is effective, then the training is probably not important enough to use valuable time in development, delivery, or tracking.
If the training is worth investment during development and the time for people to complete, then it is worth ensuring the training is effective. Your learning objectives are directly tied to your assessment. Typically, training is not considered "passed" unless there is some confirmation of successful transfer of the needed skill, knowledge, or attitudinal change.
Assessments should be:
Choose assessments that will verify whether the learner has reached the level of skill, knowledge, or attitude needed for their work responsibilities. Types of assessments range: small group scenario practice, large group call and response, formal paper or online based quiz, demonstration/observation, scenario or stepped questions, etc.
Practice activities and final assessments should be matched to the job performance: in-person observaton or computer simulation of job task or series of tasks; true/false, multiple-choice, multiple-select, or fill-in-the-blank for memorization; scenario resolution with any expected job aid, case study analysis for open-ended knowledge synthesis.
Scenario-based learning can provide information on higher-level skills such as risk assessment and response. Using characters, background sounds, and time-limits for responding can make scenarios assessments more realistic to actual job performance. A series of options using branching extends the realism with real-life type repercussions and chances to re-think choices. Work that requires collaboration and effective communication can be best assessed through small-group planning or problem-solving scenarios.
Hands-on tasks and tasks with equipment may be more economically done in-person or on-site, but may be designed for online practice and assessment with enough time and commitment of resources.
There are rooms of research on how to most effectively format written questions and answers to focus on course content and to avoid confusion. Best practices include:
Some performance experts and human resource leaders strongly support test-out options for training to reduce distractions from productive work for those employees who demonstrate they know the material and are job-ready. Of course, this requires confidence in the assessments. Some training experts point to the value of assessments as learning tools themselves -- allowing learners to make mistakes and get feedback in a low-stakes environment. The volume of the content that is being transferred in a single course may be the main driver in whether a test-out option is desirable and practical. If you are not sure, check with your regulatory agency for confirmation of whether test-out questions with feedback are an acceptable format for training. There may be minimum score requirements.
Brief information about on-going training program evaluation is found below.
All new courses and course revisions are tested thoroughly in the Ability Staging environment before being approved for moving into the Production environment. Once in the live Ability system, it is tested again. Any revisions to the course require additional testing.
There are some keys to making your testing effective.
Some testing can be conducted by people familiar with the course -- to purposefully pass and fail the quiz for example.
Some testing should be conducted by testers who have never seen the course at all. Use testers with characteristics representative of your expected audience (e.g. knowledge of subject, computer saavy, native language, reading level,...). You'll get even better assurance if you have time to prep these testers in advance to fully document their experience.
The Ability LMS includes features for surveying the learner about their impressions of a training (Kirkpatrick's level 1).
Following roll-out of your new training program, you can view completion records including scores and detailed SCORM data for each learner. When ready, the Ability helpdesk can provide information. An effective training quality assurance plan includes investigating impact on-the-job as well as completion rates and assessment scores. Reach out to your training professional or instructional designer for planning the right level of evaluation for your program and resources.
Higher level, on-going evaluation of your training program's impact will rely upon checking with the work unit to confirm on-the-job adoption of new learning and impacts on the organization. This can include interviews, accident reports, inspection results, productivity-increases or cost-savings.
See also pages on Inclusive and Trauma-Informed Training and Course Development Process.